Geraldo: Susan Atkins comes home to you with bloody fingers. She says, “Charlie, look what I did for you.”
Manson: Yeah. “I give you the world. I just killed myself and I give you the world.”
Geraldo: So, how’d you react?
Manson: I says, “You dumb fucking cunt, I already had the world, you just put me back in jail again.” And that’s what she did, she put me right back in jail.
Geraldo: How’d she react when you said that?
Manson:People don’t hear each other. We talk to each other, but very seldom do we ever communicate.
- (Source: Geraldo)
INTER AMERICAN COMMISSION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS ACCEPTS MANSON CASE
For the first time in over 40 years an independant Court will finally review the trial and wrongful conviction of Charles Manson. The IACHR has accepted the case as filed by us making a number of complaints regarding the manner upon which Mr Manson was ‘persecuted’ to conviction. Whilst not at all trying to belittle the crimes and horrendous murders that were committed those responsible for such do not include Charles Manson and as such he is entitled to a voice in a court that will truly be independant of any prejudice. An application on a without prejudice basis has also been filed with Jerry Brown the Governor of California and I hope that finally Mr Manson will be released and seen by history not as the mass murderer but as the leader of a cult group of people who sought to live within their own beliefs. Mr Manson did not and has never believed in the act of murder and has never committed murder nor sought anyone to committ such. the conduct of the prosecution and the economic viability of the prosecutors future was founded upon a conviction.Here are three further reasons why the whole matter should be reviewed and I am content that even after 40 years the IACHR has accepted jurisdictions:
- (1) Prosecuting Attorney Aaron Stovitz violated a federal gag order on the case three months into the trial. Stovitz was then replaced by Vincent Bugliosi, who was later brought up on charges of perjury FOR VIOLATING A GAG ORDER just as Stovitz!! Years later when Stovitz was interviewed he said that he believed that Charles Manson had an unfair trial.
- (2)A juror stole one of the Sharon Tate death photos and sold it to a European tabloid magazine. The juror was not excused and the trial went on. The juror should have been excused (and prosecuted) for this but never occured.
- (3) Charles Manson was given a newspaper with the headlines “Nixon Declares Manson Guilty” which the jury saw. This alone should have been grounds for a mistrial, but none of the jurors were excused and the trial went on.
- (Source: Studio Legale)